CovertCouncil

Read the document

DOCUMENT FILE · November 1987

The congressional Iran-Contra report (1987)

The joint House and Senate committees' report of November 1987: their executive summary of how the NSC staff sold arms to Iran, ran a private war in Nicaragua and diverted profits to the Contras, plus the chapter on the diversion.

Declassified 1987

First page of the document as releasedPage 1 of 49

The file

Extract
Pages 1-42,287-293 of the 708-page original: the front matter, preface and Executive Summary (printed pp. 3–22) and Chapter 15, "The Diversion" (printed pp. 269–275); the narrative chapters, minority report and additional views are in the full 708-page report. The full release is at the link below.
Full text
Read it page by page (our OCR of the scan)
Copied
26 October 2026, from an Internet Archive item (government original) (copy)
SHA-256
dacaf6895e8a076a4263db30fe5932def5d5966838a4d328484fe80dc98550af
Licence
Public domain: a work of the US federal government (17 U.S.C. § 105).

From the document

The Committees' investigation revealed that of the $16.1 million profit from the sales of arms to Iran only about $3.8 million went to support the Contras (the amount representing "the diversion").

p. 27 (printed p. 9), Executive Summary · ✓ in the text, page 27

The common ingredients of the Iran and Contra policies were secrecy, deception, and disdain for the law. A small group of senior officials believed that they alone knew what was right.

p. 29 (printed p. 11), Executive Summary, Findings and Conclusions · ✓ in the text, page 29

These were not covert actions, they were covert policies; and covert policies are incompatible with democracy.

p. 35 (printed p. 17), Executive Summary, Intelligence Abuses · ✓ in the text, page 35

Money generated by arms sales authorized by a Presidential Finding for only one covert purpose—the Iranian initiative—was used for a wholly different covert purpose—Contra support.

p. 292 (printed p. 274), Chapter 15, The Diversion · ✓ in the text, page 48

Excerpts are passages from a US government work (public domain), quoted exactly as they read in the scan, and checked against the full text on every rebuild.

Ten months after the scandal broke, the two select committees that Congress set up in January 1987 delivered a single report. The Senate committee under Daniel Inouye and the House committee under Lee Hamilton had merged their inquiries, reviewed more than 300,000 documents, questioned more than 500 witnesses and held 40 days of joint public hearings. The House committee ordered the report on 5 November 1987, and both chambers ordered it printed that month1.

The copy served here is an extract of the 708-page printed report: the front matter, the preface, the Executive Summary, and Chapter 15, on the diversion of arms-sale profits to the Nicaraguan Contras1.

What the summary says

The preface sets out the problem the committees faced: inconsistent testimony, failing memories, the death of Director of Central Intelligence William Casey in May 1987, and the shredding of documents by the National Security Council staff in the fall of 1986. The record, the committees wrote, was denied to them "and to history"1.

The Executive Summary then tells the story compactly. After Congress cut off military aid to the Contras with the Boland Amendment, the NSC staff, led operationally by Lt. Col. Oliver North, took over support of the war, raised money from foreign governments and private donors, and ran it through a private network the report calls "the Enterprise." From the summer of 1985 the same staff ran the secret arms sales to Iran that the Secretaries of State and Defense opposed as an arms-for-hostages trade. The Enterprise took in nearly $48 million; of $16.1 million in profit from the Iran sales, about $3.8 million reached the Contras1.

The findings are blunt. The committees judged that Casey had encouraged North and kept the CIA's career officers largely in the dark, while noting that the evidence of Casey's role came almost entirely from North. They found no evidence that Vice President Bush knew of the diversion. On President Reagan they concluded that, whether or not he knew, "the ultimate responsibility" rested with him1.

The diversion chapter

Chapter 15 asks who thought of the diversion, who approved it, and how much moved. It traces the idea to late 1985, when $800,000 left over from a halted shipment of HAWK missiles was spent on the Contras, and sets out the conflicting testimony: National Security Adviser John Poindexter said he approved the diversion himself and kept it from the President to give him "deniability"; North said he assumed the President knew. Only one of North's diversion memorandums survived the shredder1.

How to read it

This is the majority's report. The contents list a separate minority report signed by six House members, including Dick Cheney, and two senators, arguing from the President's constitutional powers in foreign affairs; it is not in this extract1. The committees also stated that they made no findings of criminal guilt, which they left to the independent counsel1.

The prosecutions that followed changed the story's legal ending. Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh charged 14 people and won 11 convictions, but North's and Poindexter's convictions were overturned on appeal because their immunized testimony to these same committees might have influenced witnesses at trial, and President George H. W. Bush pardoned six others on 24 December 19922,3. The scan used here is a copy of the printed report uploaded to the Internet Archive1,4.

Sources

  1. Congress Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran-Contra Affair, with Supplemental, Minority, and Additional Views (S. Rept. 100-216, H. Rept. 100-433), US Congress, Government Printing Office (scan hosted by the Internet Archive) (1987-11).
  2. Official history Final Report of the Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra Matters, Volume I: Summary of Prosecutions (Lawrence E. Walsh), Office of Independent Counsel, 1993 (HTML edition, Federation of American Scientists) (1993-08-04).
  3. Official history Final Report of the Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra Matters, Volume I (scan), Office of Independent Counsel (hosted by the Internet Archive) (1993).
  4. Wikipedia Iran–Contra affair, Wikipedia.