Full text · 27 May 1975
Ford's meeting on the submarine leak (27 May 1975)
Machine-read (OCR) from the released scan, page by page. Typewriter faces, stamps, handwriting and poor copies produce misread words; where this text and the scan disagree, the scan is the record. Black redaction bars are marked [REDACTED] where we could detect them; whited-out passages simply leave gaps. FOIA exemption codes such as (b)(3) mark withheld text.
Page 1
No text on this page (blank, image only, or unreadable).
Page 2
COPY PHOTO
EO (3626 [REDACTED]
3.3 (byID
FROM
LIBRARY FORD GERALD R
DECLASSIFIED IN PART (8)
.....-— .E0,19626.
Authority NLF_ 00-42 a
NARA__SO__ Date 2012 Bones
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
-EOP-SECGRET [REDACTED]
NODIS/XGDS
MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION
PARTICIPANTS: President Ford
Dr. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense
William E, Colby, Director, CIA
Amb. Donald Rumsfeld,,Assistant to the President
Amb. Robert S. Ingersoll, Deputy Secretary
of State
Lt. General Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant
to the President for National Security Affairs
DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, May 27, 1975
5:00 5:55 p.m.
PLACE: The Cabinet Room
The White House
The President: That was a nite ceremony at Arlington. But the people
doing it were pretty dippy.
The purpose of this meeting is simple. I was shocked when I read
in the newspaper about our submarines operating off Soviet waters. Of all
the things happening, I knew less about it than I saw in the paper. That is
a helluva note. Where does he get it? It jeopardizes the operation and
the lives of the people involved. Somehow someone must be made an
example of.
Secretary Schlesinger: It was a flagrant violation: of the law.
The President: I want State, CIA and DOD to undertake an investigation.
Secretary Schlesinger: I spoke to the Attorney General last month. There
is some indication that Hersh has files of signals intelligence material.
How about a search warrant to get them? It is a clear violation of the law.
I don't know if a jury would believe it.
cuasstFiep By ____Henry A: Kissinger
Ep (2626, (6X1) EXEMPT. FROM GENERAL DECLASSIFICATION
sonsicee [REDACTED] SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 11652
NODIS/XGDS EXEMPTION CATEGORY___5(b)(3)
AUTOMATICALLY DECLASSIFIED ON Imp. to Det,
Page 3
B0\2626 -OPSEGREF/
3:3 (WON) /NODIS/XGDS
The President: Have you asked counsel how to proceed?
Secretary Schlesinger: He was reluctant to do so last month but it is
clear this is a violation of the law.
Director Colby: There was an article in the New York Times in June
1974 which was similar but without detail. It seemed to come from the
Marchetti book. The Supreme Court refusal to review the Marchetti
case is good news. In the Marchetti case we had to prove the material
was classified. It was made available to the defense counsel. The
quotation in the Sunday paper was a direct quotation from the sanitized
not the unsanitized version,
We took this up with Justice today to see if we could get a contempt
citation against the Marchetti lawyers.
With respect to Section 798 of the Espionage Act, it is true that
publication is a crime, but there has been only one conviction under it,
and it was a guilty plea. We are trying to get an indictment against Agee
onit. Heis out of the country, though.
General Scowcroft: The real problem is not the press. The real problem
is the people who are leaking the material to the press. They are the
ones we have to go after.
[REDACTED] Secretary Schlesinger:
GO \452b [REDACTED]
4.410) [REDACTED]
The President: How many people would know about one or both of these
operations?
£0 13926 Director Colby: was known fairly widely over the years.
3,3 (WIN)
The codeword has been obsolete since 1972, which is about the
time of the Marchetti-Marks book. Marks probably had access.
Eo 620 «Os FOR SECRET
rop-secre? i
3.3(HU) ER Nowts/xcps
PHOTO COPY
GERALD R FORD LIBRARY
Page 4
EO 13626
3.(b)L1)
EO |2626 [REDACTED]
3.5 (1)
EO 13526
1)
/NODIS/XGDS
The President: I don't think we can let this go by without an internal
investigation, at least internally, and perhaps by the Bureau. This is
a most flagrant violation. I think each of the Departments should
initiate it.
Secretary Schlesinger: MayI suggest that the FBI doit? They are.
better equipped to do the right job.
[The President decided to go the FBI route.
Secretary Schlesinger: 1 think most of this comes from former employees.
How do you get at them? Gi
Director Colby: We need better legislation. Our protection of secrets
is lousy.
SerretaryeSchlesinger: The Murphy Commission Chairman said he would
recommend tougher laws in this area.
The President: We are sending up a crime bill with recommendations for
revision of the criminal code.
In a communication to Justice, we ought to ask for their action
and for recommendations.in this case under the law (prosecution of Hersh
and the New York Times. )
Mr. Rumsfeld: If this is as cold a case as Jim and Bill say, maybe part
of the process of initiative should be formal notification to the New York
Times, CIA review committees, etc., to put them on notice that we are
taking it very seriously.
Secretary Schlesinger: If we turn off the [REDACTED] mission, you should
consider a search warrant. That would lead to those providing him the
information, It could also be given to a grand jury.
The President: Let's get the best people in Phil's [Buchen's] office and
Justice going onit. Also, Justice should look into the alternatives of
getting at Hersh and the New York Times.
POP-SHERES
FT NODIS/XGDS man cory
GRRALB R FORD LIBRARY
Page 5
No text on this page (blank, image only, or unreadable).